According to this magazine article bees apparently fly with their back legs bent at the knees to form a 90 degree angle [please see page below] ... which explains (of course) why the strand of cotton firmly tied up at the popliteal level of their legs does not slide off during flight ... Hmm ... Hmm ...
The dash board and steering wheel of the Toyota 4X4 depicted in the above photograph indicates that this particular Toyota Land Cruiser (which was used for this article published in the magazine New Idea on the 6th of August 1988) is in fact a 1985 FJ 40 model. Earlier models of the FJ 40 steering wheels have a smaller (and round) centre piece. So, it would appear that a near brand new (only 3 y.o.) Toyota Land Cruiser was dismantled in 1988 ... specifically for this story ... to make it look like the earlier model wrecks used in the Northern Territory to chase water buffaloes ... Hmm ... Hmm
At page 23 of the magazine New Idea dated 6/8/88, we read :“In an early radio interview, Rod claims, Paul cited the Parkinson Interview as the spark that fired his
"NO TRANSCRIPT OF THE RADIO SHOW EXISTS”.
How could this radio show transcript possibly exist for an alleged Michael Parkinson Interview with Rod Ansell that NEVER TOOK PLACE ?
Below is the Google Books link that takes us to excerpts of a book written by Professor Lynette Sheridan Burns titled : "Understanding Journalism". The viewer can draw his or her own conclusion by reading the admission made by the author of this book at page 167; that the Ansell saga was nothing more than a blatant hoax ...
Please type : "Understanding Journalism" by Professor Lynette Sheridan Burns in the google search box at the bottom of this screen to access the contents of this particular book.
Or please type Lynette Sheridan Burns : "Understanding Journalism" in the Google search box after clicking on the below hyper link to access Google Books :
It is widely known across Australia that “Ansell” is a brand of contraceptive. It is also widely known that the purpose of using a contraceptive is to counter an anticipated end result that is unwanted.
Just like a contraceptive, a fallacy can also be used to produce a similar end result that is the direct opposite as to what the said fallacy initially purports to establish.
A fallacy that is so implausible to the point of being an absurdity, therefore, renders the said fallacy to be contra-suggestive and ergo produces an end result that is the direct opposite as to what the said fallacy initially purports to establish.
A fallacy that is so implausible to the point of being an absurdity incorporates an inbuilt SELF ADMISSION that the fallacy was meant to be CONTRA-SUGGESTIVE right from the start when it was fabricated.
... and where did Keith Willey get the scenes and dialogues that feature at the New York party scene that is depicted in the film ? Did these scenes and dialogues take place in the Australian bush when he and Bill Dean were hunting crocodiles ? If so - who did the cross-dressing and who was snorting cocaine in the book "Crocodile Hunt" ?
When Keith Willey was alive, homosexuality and cross-dressing were regarded as an absolute CURSE by Ocker Australians. At that same point in time "Poofter Bashing" was also one of the main traits of Ocker Culture.
What is the motive NOW for macho Ockers to make a back flip about what they once considered to be an absolute CURSE before the release and exhibition of the film "Crocodile Dundee" ??
Is the motive a question of narcissistic pride or is it purely financial ?
This crock of a counter claim made 24 years after the film "Crocodile Dundee" was released for exhibition in 1986 should have been made to counter the Rod Ansell saga at the same time that it was being published by the media ... instead of on the 3rd of October 2010 and in particular ... AFTER Professor Lynnette Sheridan Burns has made the admission that the Rod Ansell saga was just an illusion that had been created by mainstream media.
Why don't these opportunists tell us RIGHT NOW what the title of the book is or what live character the next block buster is going to be based on BEFORE THE FILM IS RELEASED FOR EXHIBITION ?
How could the TRUE AUTHOR be accused of having copied some other person's book when the accuser herself is convinced that the TRUE AUTHOR has NEVER READ THE SAID BOOK ??
Copy of an email received from the grand daughter of William 'Bill' Dean