Name of proponent on this Notice of Motion is Maxwell Thomas Bennett
The deponent on this so called affidavit is Maxwell Thomas Bennett Bonnell
The viewer's attention is invited to focus on the name "MALLESON" listed as one of the previous CEOS of the Law Institute of Victoria and compare this name to the name of the Law Firm engaged by the respondents in V682/01.
Address of the deponent in this affidavit is incomplete without a house or street number which makes this affidavit an invalid court document.
Signature of the witness is that of the fictitious person Maxwell Thomas Bennett Bonnell (a fictitious name created by the lawyer &) is not the real name of the lawyer : Maxwell Thomas Bennett ...
A copy of a 1965 episode of the vintage Mavis Bramston Show obtained from the Australian Film Archives in Canberra features an actor by the name of GORDON CHATER who smashes eggs and tomatoes followed by a cream pie on top of his head and face and then uses a soda siphon to wash up the entire mess ... Was that the kind of humour depicted in "Crocodile Dundee" ? CERTAINLY NOT !!! It is said in comedy circles that a person's particular style of humour is as unique as a set of finger prints or DNA. Isn't it true that the vintage Paul Hogan Shows not only had a lot in common with the Benny Hill Show but also with the comedy style of "Dave Allen" who sat on a stool to deliver his lines.
According to the Hallywell's nomenclature, the "Phantom" was an original work for a black and white film that dates all the way back to 1943. The screenplay for this particular film was still protected by copyright laws in 1989 when it was alleged the screenplay for another "Phamtom" film was "written" according to Encore - i.e. 46 years after the original work had been created in 1943. Copyright for an original creation subsists for 50 years after the first publication of the original creation.
No listing in the Australian Writer's Guild under the exact name of "Kenneth George Shadie".
Ultimate proof that "Kenneth George Shadie" is an exact name which doesn't exist and certainly did not exist in May 1984 as a real person in material form - i.e. as a real person made of flesh and bones.
The TRUE AUTHOR does not need to rob a bank to recover his ROYALTIES. His ROYALTIES were legitimately earned (albeit in fiduciary form) when his ORIGINAL ARTISTIC WORK for the film “Crocodile Dundee” was EXCHANGED for them (his ROYALTIES) since May 1984. Please make a note of the BOWLER HAT that the true author portrayed as "Ben Doyle" is wearing when Lightning Jack and he decide to deposit Ben's legitimately earned royalties in the "safest" bank in the State.
The exact amount of the true author’s royalties could not be calculated in May 1984 because the future earnings of the film at the box office could not possibly have been known at that point in time … i.e. BEFORE the film was actually produced and exhibited worldwide.
Every income earned in Australia consists of (1) the TAX PAYABLE component and (2) the BALANCE owing to the Income Earner/Taxpayer. No income earned in Australia could possibly be TAXED at the TAX RATE of 100 percent !!
Please make a note also of the metaphorical analogies incorporated in the story line for the film “Lightning Jack” in the above video clip, where the said metaphorical analogies can be appropriated to the amendments made to Australia’s IP Laws (in 2000) by the Federal Government of the day.
An author's presentation of his/her original work/s recorded as digital files on USB flash drives and Audio Magnetic Tape Recording Devices, are NOW and AT LAST accepted by the Legal Profession ...
A small step forward for lawyers and a giant leap forward for aspiring authors worldwide ...
The above video which depicts Republican the Hon. Steve Scalise – Minority Whip from Louisiana – questioning Marc Zuckerberg about the nature of the algorithms of computer algebra that Facebook utilizes, demonstrates that American politicians – UNLIKE AUSTRALIAN LAWYERS – are not only AWARE of the existence of the algorithms of computer algebra, but are also AWARE that the algorithms of computer algebra can be utilised to identify individual people worldwide by means of their likes and dislikes, as well as by their other minor characteristics with pin-point accuracy.
If these minor details and other characteristics
of individual people worldwide can be identified so easily by means of the algorithms
of computer algebra, logic dictates that the identification of true authors of
so called orphaned works would also be extremely easy to achieve with the use
of the algorithms of computer algebra.
I have come across a video clip on You-Tube in which the Hon. Steve Scalise, Republican whip from Louisiana questions Mr. Marc Zuckerberg about the nature of the algorithms that Facebook utilises.
I guess that the content of this email would be of some interest to you.
In May 1984, I devised an analytical method that I had intended to use in the future to identify myself as the true author of an original artistic work which I had created at that same point in time, for a very successful film that was planned for production in 1985 and exhibition worldwide two years in the future (i.e. in 1986). My reason for doing so was suspicion at the time of the possibility that I would be denied my royalties entitlement for my creation of the original artistic work, on account of the unconventional manner that had been employed to record the said original artistic work.
The work was recorded on a magnetic tape recording device instead of the conventional manuscript in hard copy written form.
The title that I had given to the said analytical method since May 1984 was : “Psycho-Linguistic-Analysis” (PLA). The analytical method that I had meticulously devised then, consisted of one stochastic model which was to merge with another deterministic model to subsequently trigger an elimination process right through to the isolation of ONE only probability among an UNLIMITED number of probabilities.
For this method to work, there was a need for me to insert into the story line for the film project at point, ninety-six  sets of key words which I was confident at the time would identify myself (if need be in the future) as the true author of the said original artistic work for a film that was pre planned to have a screen duration of ninety-six  minutes.
The reason being that the method was designed to be similar to the Heuristics of search engines (today) when an Arboreal (or Boolean) search is conducted by users on the Internet – It needs to be remembered not only that the Internet did not exist in 1984 but also that an Arboreal (or Boolean) search conducted on the Internet TODAY requires ONLY an average of 4 to 5 key words typed in any Search Engine’s search box to isolate ONE only probability among an UNLIMITED number of probabilities.
What followed would certainly affirm the dictum : “Necessity is the mother of invention”.
As the title suggests, a PLA was designed to be carried out by means of an assessment of the nature of the words which are used by anybody and everybody in speeches, screenplays, court transcripts and court documents, as well as in written media publications.
Based on the expressed (as well as the implied) meaning of the words that are used when a person strings together a set of words to form a sentence, a numerical value is allocated to each and every word that a speech or a document in written form consists of. A POSITIVE numerical value is allocated to words which reflect e.g. RELEVANCE, truth, virtue, goodness or merit etc. and a NEGATIVE value is allocated to words which reflect e.g. IRRELEVANCE, EVASION, fallacy, evil, fraud or violence etc.
As a result of the proven efficacy of the numerical characteristics of the analytical method that I had devised since May 1984, the computer software industry subsequently replaced the symbolic values of the algorithms of computer algebra – as were previously utilised in the Heuristics of Search Engines on the Internet – with numerical values.
These numerical values have proved since, that they can effectively eliminate
any possible inaccuracies in the results of searches conducted on the Internet by
users, by providing end results that are 100 % accurate every time an Arboreal
(or Boolean) search is conducted.
When I was denied my royalties (as I had anticipated all the way back since May 1984 would be the case in the future) there was a need for me to take my grievances (i.e. the relevant IP dispute) to the Federal Court in Melbourne, Australia, for adjudication.
The Federal Court decided to displace and replace the relevant issue that I had brought before the court for adjudication by the court (and not by the respondents) with a secondary side issue that had no pertinence whatsoever to the real issue at point – i.e. that proof of authorship in my original artistic work for the film in question, by means of the ninety-six  sets of key words that I had inserted into the story line for the said film since May 1984, was in fact conclusive.
This negative course of action undertaken by the Federal Court was due probably to the legal profession in Australia (at that particular point in time) being totally unaware of what could be achieved if the algorithms of computer algebra are used to identify the author/s of so called orphaned original artistic works.
I doubt whether the Australian legal profession (at that point in time) was even aware of the existence of the algorithms of computer algebra, since computer science is not included in the university courses undertaken by would-be lawyers in Australia.
I then successfully used the same analytical method that I had devised since May 1984, to establish that the judgement issued by the Federal Court in Melbourne Australia, was not only flawed and contained very little substance, but also that it contained elements of perjury and perversion of the course of justice on the part of the lawyer representing the respondents.
So, as you have probably already concluded by now, the algorithms utilised by Facebook most certainly have no intent to place (or currently contain) any “bias” in its algorithms to give preference to one political party to the detriment of another political party in the United States, or anywhere else in the world just the same.
What is set aside, blocked or discarded altogether by the Heuristics of various
computer automated systems that are governed by the algorithms of computer
algebra (as demonstrated above) rely essentially on the nature of the words that
advertisements and/or news feed are made of.
If some particular advertisement/s accumulate a very high sum total of NEGATIVE numerical values, the system would automatically give preference instead to the ones that accumulate a high sum total of POSITIVE numerical values.
It needs to be noted on the other hand, however, that mainstream media in Australia deliberately places a bias in the same kind of algorithms that they use to control (by filtering) public feed-back to articles they publish and share on Social Media, to block user comments that are inappropriate, offensive, rude, or of adverse opinion etc. … but most importantly, comments that denounce with evidence in support that the subject matter and/or part of the content of the articles being published by mainstream media is/are fallacy/fallacies.
I sincerely hope that this information will provide some useful information to yourself and your colleagues in the US Government’s endeavour to legislate against any deliberate “bias” placed in the algorithms utilised by all Social Media platforms - AS WELL AS mainstream media – to give political advantage to one political party in preference to another.
If the Messiah lived today, His famous dictum would read : “I am the light – I am the truth – I am the algorithms of computer algebra”.
Do you know the person named "Anger" who is trying to justify the act of stealing ?
In the modern and real world, a man without material wealth CANNOT be loved, and in reality is in practice NEVER loved. The reason for this is simply because a man without material wealth has nothing to exchange for what is "said" to be love.
Some rich people say that "Money cannot make you happy" ... and yet these rich people DO NOT GIVE the money that they have stolen BACK to the person who God had intended to legitimately have this money since birth ... by giving this person outstanding artistic talents (at birth).
Why do these rich people keep what PRECISELY is making them so UNHAPPY ??
The lyrics of the song titled "Affirmation" by Savage Garden contains the appropriate words in the lyrics : "I believe the only ones who disagree are millionaires".
According to recently conducted polls, the LACK OF WHAT DOES NOT MAKE PEOPLE HAPPY is certainly the current cause of many people's misery !
Is it EASIER to raise taxes and inflate the cost of utilities to increase revenue, rather than ALLOW productive and artistic people to generate phenomenal amounts of money through the influx of foreign currency ? Why take this course of action when the phenomenal amounts of money that artistic people normally generate would -- ultimately -- benefit the entire nation ?
How many people approve of the unpopular ideology of robbing Peter (who is considered to be financially comfortable) to pay Paul who is considered to be poor ?
According to the latest poll, only 29 percent of the Australian public does ...
I own the copyright in the lyrics as well as in the music for the above song performed by Savage Garden. How could I possibly be prevented from enjoying the freedom of publishing my own work on my very own website ??
Once upon a time, there was a notorious out-law in Australia who believed that he could own what he had stolen. His name was Ned Kelly. Ned Kelly finished up swinging at the end of a rope ...
... and See for yourself how the "Rule of Law" has become a